Ricardo Preciado v. Kilolo Kijakazi
Ricardo Preciado |
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi |
2:2022cv06743 |
September 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Proof of Service #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Service/Waivers of Summons and Complaints -> Service of S/C Returned Executed as to USA. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed Ricardo Preciado, upon Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi served on 9/23/2022, answer due 10/24/2022. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Mota, Maria) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV22-6743 AGR on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Preciado. (Mota, Maria) |
Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Tina Naicker added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Naicker, Tina) |
Filing 7 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER [Social Security] by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. THE COURT'S CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER HAS BEEN REVISED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 2016. PLEASE REVIEW THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. In accordance with General Order 05-01, this case is designated for electronic filing. A chambers copy is not required unless ordered by the court. In order to facilitate the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of this case, the parties shall comply with the following instructions: (see document for further details). (hr) |
Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Preciado, (Mota, Maria) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Ricardo Preciado. (Mota, Maria) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Ricardo Preciado. (Mota, Maria) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34014089 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Ricardo Preciado. (Attorney Maria Guadalupe Mota added to party Ricardo Preciado(pty:pla))(Mota, Maria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.