Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. et al
Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC |
Aetna Life Insurance Co. and DOES 1-10 |
2:2022cv06791 |
September 21, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Karen L Stevenson |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 REPLY In Support of Motion to Dismiss NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #10 filed by Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Co.. (Ernster, Shannon) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #10 filed by Plaintiff Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC. (Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
![]() |
Filing 11 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #10 filed by Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Co.. (Ernster, Shannon) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Co.. Motion set for hearing on 12/2/2022 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of P&A ISO MTD, #2 Declaration ISO MTD, #3 Proposed Order) (Ernster, Shannon) |
Filing 9 Notice Confirming Notification to State Court of Removal filed by Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Co.. (Ernster, Shannon) |
Filing 8 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Aetna Life Insurance Co. answer now due 10/28/2022, re Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Co..(Ernster, Shannon) |
![]() |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (et) |
CONFORMED E-FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Aetna Life Insurance Co., Does 1-10. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/9/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A AS ATTACHMENT NO.2 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ]. (et) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Aetna Life Insurance Co., Does 1-10 amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by Plaintiff Healthcare Ally Management of California, LLC. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 8/22/2022 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT B AS ATTACHMENT NO. 2 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ](et) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Co., identifying Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company; Aetna, Inc., parent of Aetna Life Insurance Company; CVS, ultimate parent of Aetna, Inc.; Plaintiff Healthcare Ally Management LLC; and La Peer Surgery Center, third party medical provider. (Attorney Courtney C Hill added to party Aetna Life Insurance Co.(pty:dft))(Hill, Courtney) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Co.. (Ernster, Shannon) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 22STCV18878 Receipt No: ACACDC-34022458 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Aetna Life Insurance Co.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration ISO Defendant's Removal, #2 Declaration ISO Defendant's Removal) (Attorney Shannon Lissa Ernster added to party Aetna Life Insurance Co.(pty:dft))(Ernster, Shannon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.