Brandi Montana v. Cigna et al
Brandi Montana |
Cigna and Careallies |
2:2022cv06873 |
September 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
Stephen V Wilson |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Plaintiff Brandi Montana, (es) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendants Careallies, Cigna. (hr) |
![]() |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ATTACHMENT filed by plaintiff Brandi Montana. (aco) |
![]() |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by plaintiff Brandi Montana. (ghap) |
Filing 2 Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by plaintiff Brandi Montana. (ghap) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Careallies, Cigna.Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar., filed by plaintiff Brandi Montana. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.