Qiong Zhou v. Ur Mendoza Jaddou et al
Qiong Zhou |
Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Susan M. Curda and Corina Luna |
2:2022cv07010 |
September 28, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 09/28/2022, receipt number ACACDC-34064104), filed by plaintiff Qiong Zhou.(Spence, Joel) |
Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Susan M. Curda, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Corina Luna. (lh) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff QIONG ZHOU, (Spence, Joel) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff QIONG ZHOU. (Spence, Joel) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff QIONG ZHOU. (Spence, Joel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-34064104 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff QIONG ZHOU. (Attorney Joel E Spence added to party QIONG ZHOU(pty:pla))(Spence, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.