John Doe No 19-3251 v. Jonathan Gast et al
| John Doe No 19-3251 |
| Chier Intake Jonathan Gast, FHEO, City of Los Angeles, Housing Author, Volunters of America of Los Angeles, Guards Morningstar-Brown, Shallow Horn-Jones, Silvia Young, HACLA, Laura Roberts, Shannon Bostic, John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 2, John Doe 3, Jane Doe 3, John Doe 4, Jane Doe 4, John Doe 5, Jane Doe 5, John Doe 6, Jane Doe 6, John Doe 7, Jane Doe 7, John Doe 8, Jane Doe 8, John Doe 9 and Jane Doe 9 |
| 2:2022cv09273 |
| December 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Alka Sagar |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 23-55006 assigned to Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #9 as to plaintiff John Doe No 19-3251. (lc) |
| Filing 10 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #9 filed by Plaintiff John Doe No 19-3251. [Document forward to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.] (mat) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by Plaintiff John Doe No 19-3251. Appeal of Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60),, #7 Filed On: 12/27/22; Entered On: 12/27/22; Motion for In forma Paupers filed for the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. (mat) |
| Filing 8 MOVE TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE FOR ALL filed by plaintiff John Doe No 19-3251. as to All Defendants (lc) |
Filing 7
ORDER ON REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (NON-PRISONER CASE} #2 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: On the question of indigency, the Court finds that the party who filed the Request is not able to pay the filing fees. As explained in the attached statement, the Request is DENIED because: The action is frivolous or malicious. The action fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The deficiencies in the complaint cannot be cured byamendment, this case is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (lc)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff John Doe No 19-3251. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff John Doe No 19-3251. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Shannon Bostic, City of Los Angeles, FHEO, Jonathan Gast, HACLA, Shallow Horn-Jones, Housing Author, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 4, Jane Doe 5, Jane Doe 6, Jane Doe 7, Jane Doe 8, Jane Doe 9, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, John Doe 7, John Doe 8, John Doe 9, Morningstar-Brown, Laura Roberts, Volunters of America of Los Angeles, Silvia Young.Case assigned to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff John Doe No 19-3251. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
