United States of America v. Olympia Health Care LLC et al
| United States of America |
| Olympia Health Care LLC, Alecto Healthcare Services, LLC, MPT of Los Angeles, L.P., MPT of Olympia, LLC, MPT Operating Partnership, L.P., Medical Properties Trust, Inc., Sherman/Grayson Hospital, Inc., Alecto Healthcare Services Sherman, LLC, Laxman Reddy, Matthew Williams, Jeremy Redin and Sherman Grayson Hospital, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv01783 |
| March 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Otis D Wright |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2345 Medicare Recovery |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. answer now due 6/9/2023; Medical Properties Trust, Inc. answer now due 6/9/2023; MPT of Los Angeles, L.P. answer now due 6/9/2023; MPT of Olympia, LLC answer now due 6/9/2023, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.; Medical Properties Trust, Inc.; MPT of Los Angeles, L.P.; MPT of Olympia, LLC.(Attorney Samuel M Kidder added to party MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.(pty:dft), Attorney Samuel M Kidder added to party MPT of Los Angeles, L.P.(pty:dft), Attorney Samuel M Kidder added to party MPT of Olympia, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Samuel M Kidder added to party Medical Properties Trust, Inc.(pty:dft))(Kidder, Samuel) |
| Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff United States of America. upon MPT Operating Partnership, L.P. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/13/2023, answer due 5/12/2023; MPT of Los Angeles, L.P. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/13/2023, answer due 5/12/2023; MPT of Olympia, LLC waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/13/2023, answer due 5/12/2023; Medical Properties Trust, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/13/2023, answer due 5/12/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Samuel M. Kidder. (Kresse, John) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Defendant Olympia Health Care LLC. upon Olympia Health Care LLC waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/13/2023, answer due 5/12/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Uttam Dhillon. (Dhillon, Uttam) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Defendant Sherman Grayson Hospital, Inc.. upon Sherman Grayson Hospital, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/13/2023, answer due 5/12/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Uttam Dhillon. (Dhillon, Uttam) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Defendant Laxman Reddy. upon Laxman Reddy waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/13/2023, answer due 5/12/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Uttam Dhillon. (Dhillon, Uttam) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Defendant Matthew Williams. upon Matthew Williams waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/13/2023, answer due 5/12/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Uttam Dhillon. (Dhillon, Uttam) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Defendant Jeremy Redin. upon Jeremy Redin waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/13/2023, answer due 5/12/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Uttam Dhillon. (Dhillon, Uttam) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Defendant Alecto Healthcare Services Sherman, LLC. upon Alecto Healthcare Services Sherman, LLC waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/13/2023, answer due 5/12/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Uttam Dhillon. (Dhillon, Uttam) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Defendant Alecto Healthcare Services, LLC. upon Alecto Healthcare Services, LLC waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/13/2023, answer due 5/12/2023. Waiver of Service signed by Uttam Dhillon. (Dhillon, Uttam) |
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR EXCEPT FOR motions for summary judgment and any other evidence-heavy motions. The Courts Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the US District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 1 Civil Cover Sheet is attached to the Complaint. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney John Robert Kresse added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Kresse, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
