Changwu Huang et al v. Merrick B. Garland et al
Plaintiff: Changyu Huang and Ying Lei
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, L. Francis Cissna and Does 1 through 10
Case Number: 2:2023cv03143
Filed: April 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2023 Filing 12 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Percy Anderson. Pursuant to the Court's May 5, 2023 Minute Order, it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. RE:MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-COURT ORDER #11 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (aco)
May 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS-COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court therefore dismisses CV 23-3143 PA (ASx) with prejudice as a duplicate action. The Court will issue a Judgment consistent with this Order. (See document for further details). (aco)
April 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. On April 26, 2023, Plaintiffs initiated a new action, Case No. CV 23-3143 PA (ASx), that contains a nearly identical Complaint with duplicate factual allegations, causes of action, and seeking the same relief. Plaintiffs seemingly identified the new action as identical to Case No. CV 23-2072 PA (ASx) (see Docket No. 3), and this Court accepted the low number transfer pursuant to General Order 21-01. Plaintiffs are therefore ordered to show cause in writing why Case No. 23-3143 PA (ASx) should not be dismissed as a duplicate action. Plaintiffs' Response to this Order to Show Cause shall be filed by no later than May 4, 2023. (lom)
April 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
April 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE Pursuant General Order 21-01 (identical case) by Judge Percy Anderson, Case Management and Assignment Committee Chair. Case transferred to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson for all further proceedings. All discovery matters are transferred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. Case number now reads as 2:23-cv-03143 PA(ASx). (rn)
April 26, 2023 Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants L. Francis Cissna, Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas. (et)
April 26, 2023 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et)
April 26, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (et)
April 26, 2023 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Changyu Huang. (Ingraham, Douglas)
April 26, 2023 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Changyu Huang. (Ingraham, Douglas)
April 26, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Changyu Huang, (Ingraham, Douglas)
April 26, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35202892 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Changyu Huang. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-2) (Attorney Douglas G Ingraham added to party Changyu Huang(pty:pla))(Ingraham, Douglas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Changwu Huang et al v. Merrick B. Garland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Changyu Huang
Represented By: Douglas G Ingraham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ying Lei
Represented By: Douglas G Ingraham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: L. Francis Cissna
Represented By: OIL-DCS Trial Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?