Liming Zhu v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
Liming Zhu |
Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Director David M. Radel, USCIS, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, David M. Radel and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services |
2:2023cv04197 |
May 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Rozella A Oliver |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Liming Zhu, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to civil process clerk. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to David Radel, director of Los Angeles Asylum Office. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. (Zhou, Mei) |
Filing 15 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant David M. Radel. (dml) |
Filing 14 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (dml) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Summons Request #10 , Summons Request #11 by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. The documents are stricken. (dml) |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Summons Request #10 , Summons Request #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Documents submitted in the wrong case. (dml) |
Filing 11 [STRICKEN] Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Liming Zhu. (Zhou, Mei) Modified on 7/5/2023 (dml). |
Filing 10 [STRICKEN] Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Liming Zhu. (Zhou, Mei) Modified on 7/5/2023 (dml). |
Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Liming Zhu. (Zhou, Mei) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Liming Zhu. (Zhou, Mei) |
Filing 7 Text Only Entry: Per Fiscal Dept filing fee of $402. was paid thru Pay.gov on 6-22-2023, Receipt No. ACACDC-35540675. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dml) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 6 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN FILED DOCUMENT RE: Complaint with In Forma Pauperis request #3 and Deficiency in Attorney Case Opening #5 by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. Counsel is directed to file, as a separate document, the application to proceed using the event: Civil Events/Motions and Related Filings/Applications/Proceed In Forma Pauperis by June 26, 2023. (dml) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #3 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment(s): # 3 Supplement Fee Waiver Form Short The document(s) should have been filed separately using the event Proceed In Forma Pauperis. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs.. (sh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (sh) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by plaintiff Liming Zhu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Notice of Interested Parties, #3 Supplement Fee Waiver Form Short, #4 Supplement Tax Returns)(Zhou, Mei) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by plaintiff Liming Zhu. (Attachments: #1 Supplement I 589 Receipt, #2 Supplement Proof of Jurisdiction) (Attorney Mei Zhou added to party Liming Zhu(pty:pla))(Zhou, Mei) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.