Candelario Hector Jalomo v. Kilolo Kijakazi
| Candelario Hector Jalomo |
| Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 2:2023cv07190 |
| August 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Wesley L Hsu |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attorney Michael K Marriott added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft))(Marriott, Michael) |
Filing 5
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER [Social Security] by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (see document for details) (hr)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Wesley L. Hsu and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Candelario Hector Jalomo, (Aghai, Sima) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Candelario Hector Jalomo. (Aghai, Sima) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-35957707 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Candelario Hector Jalomo. (Attorney Sima G Aghai added to party Candelario Hector Jalomo(pty:pla))(Aghai, Sima) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
