Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP v. Diaz
Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP |
Ulises Pizano Diaz and Ulises Pizano-Diaz |
2:2023cv08299 |
October 3, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
Margo A Rocconi |
George H Wu |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ulises Pizano-Diaz, (Welch, Kevin) |
![]() |
Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Document RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (aco) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Ulises Pizano-Diaz.(Attorney Kevin Matthew Welch added to party Ulises Pizano-Diaz(pty:dft))(Welch, Kevin) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP, upon Defendant Ulises Pizano-Diaz served on 10/17/2023, answer due 11/7/2023. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kalle E. Mikkola - Attorney/Authorized to Accept on Behalf in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed (Paris, Louise Jillian) |
![]() |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Ulises Pizano-Diaz. (lh) |
Filing 10 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (lh) |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP. (Paris, Louise Jillian) |
Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Louise Jillian Gatchalian Paris counsel for Plaintiff Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP. Adding Ariana Santoro as counsel of record for Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiff Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP. (Paris, Louise Jillian) |
Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Louise Jillian Gatchalian Paris counsel for Plaintiff Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP. Adding Omid E. Khalifeh as counsel of record for Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by plaintiff Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP. (Paris, Louise Jillian) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP, (Paris, Louise Jillian) |
Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP. (Paris, Louise Jillian) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP. (Paris, Louise Jillian) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-36153691 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Louise Jillian Gatchalian Paris added to party Yagoubzadeh Law Firm LLP(pty:pla))(Paris, Louise Jillian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.