Natalie Gomez et al v. Senior Operations, LLC et al
| Natalie Gomez, Advanced Weight Loss Surgical Association and Minimally Invasive Surgical Association |
| Senior Operations, LLC and DOES 1-10 |
| 2:2023cv10135 |
| December 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Brianna Fuller Mircheff |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Senior Operations, LLC, identifying Plaintiff Natalie Gomez; Plaintiff Advanced Weight Loss Surgical Association; Plaintiff Minimally Invasive Surgical Association; Defendant Senior Operations LLC; Senior US Holdings Inc.. (Archibald, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Senior Operations, LLC identifying Senior US Holdings Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Archibald, Christopher) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Senior Operations, LLC. (Archibald, Christopher) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 23STCV24027 Receipt No: ACACDC-36501109 - Fee: $405, filed by defendant Senior Operations, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Ex. 1 - Summons, #2 Ex. 2 - Complaint, #3 Ex. 3 - Answer) (Attorney Christopher J Archibald added to party Senior Operations, LLC(pty:dft))(Archibald, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
