Rufus Darnell Thomas v. Martin OMalley,
| Rufus Darnell Thomas |
| Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security and Martin OMalley |
| 2:2024cv00190 |
| January 8, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Wesley L Hsu |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Martin OMalley. (Attorney Michael K Marriott added to party Martin OMalley(pty:dft))(Marriott, Michael) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Wesley L. Hsu and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (lh) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Rufus Darnell Thomas. (Aghai, Sima) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Rufus Darnell Thomas, (Aghai, Sima) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Rufus Darnell Thomas. (Aghai, Sima) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by plaintiff Rufus Darnell Thomas. (Attorney Sima G Aghai added to party Rufus Darnell Thomas(pty:pla))(Aghai, Sima) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
