L.A. Specialty Produce Co. v. Claim Jumper Acquisition Company, LLC et al
L.A. Specialty Produce Co. a California corporation doing business as Vesta Foodservice |
Del Mar Group, LLC, BHTT Holdings, LLC, KRG JCS Redondo Beach, LLC, Claim Jumper Acquisition Company, LLC a Nevada limited liability company doing business as Claim Jumper Steakhouse & Bar, Kelly Investment Group, LLC, Kelly Operations Group, LLC, C Jumper Restaurants, Inc., Michael R Kelly, KRG Claim Jumper, LLC, KRG BHTT, LLC, Kelly Companies Of Southern California, LLC and Claim Jumper Restaurant (Sacramento), LLC |
2:2024cv06759 |
August 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Agriculture Acts |
07 U.S.C. ยง 499 Agricultural Commodities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff L.A. Specialty Produce Co.. (Monroe, June) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff L.A. Specialty Produce Co., (Monroe, June) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff L.A. Specialty Produce Co.. (Monroe, June) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37997584 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff L.A. Specialty Produce Co.. (Attorney June T Monroe added to party L.A. Specialty Produce Co.(pty:pla))(Monroe, June) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.