Daniel Seegmiller et al v. 3M Company et al
| John Crane Inc. |
| 2:2024cv06823 |
| August 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant John Crane Inc., (Scheffy, Mirna) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant John Crane Inc.. (Scheffy, Mirna) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 24STCV16979 Receipt No: ACACDC-38009558 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant John Crane Inc.. (Attorney Mirna Jeftic Scheffy added to party John Crane Inc.(pty:bkmov))(Scheffy, Mirna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Daniel Seegmiller et al v. 3M Company et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: John Crane Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Mirna Jeftic Scheffy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
