Taharka Aboke Bey v. Tariq A. Nasheed
Taharka Aboke Bey |
Tariq A. Nasheed and Marcus Vincent Thomas |
2:2024cv06922 |
August 12, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
Pedro V Castillo |
Otis D Wright |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Tariq A. Nasheed, identifying Tariq Nasheed. (Semerdjieva, Nadia) |
Filing 32 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Defendant Tariq A. Nasheed's First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #30 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. RE Proposed order date of signature is Erroneously PREDATED as " November 18, 2024" and should have been left blank. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 31 DECLARATION of Nadia Gueorguieva Semerdjieva in support of First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #30 filed by Defendant Tariq A. Nasheed. (Semerdjieva, Nadia) |
Filing 30 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Tariq A. Nasheed. Motion set for hearing on 11/18/2024 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order 2:24-cv-06922-ODW-PVC Proposed Order) (Semerdjieva, Nadia) |
Filing 29 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court reviewed Defendants Motion to Dismiss #27 . The Court STRIKES that document for the following reason(s): Missing required information (e.g., Notice of Motion; title page or caption information; table of contents; table of authorities; index of exhibits; Proposed Order, etc.). See C.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-4, 7-20, 11-3, 11-8.OTHER : Motion does not include date and time of the Motion hearing per C.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 6-1, 7-4. The document is stricken and not part of the record. The Court will consider Defendants Motion untimely if a corrected Motion is not filed on or before October 8, 2024. (lc) |
Filing 28 DECLARATION of Nadia Gueorguieva Semerdjieva in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous #27 filed by Defendant Tariq A. Nasheed. (Semerdjieva, Nadia) |
Filing 27 (STRICKEN AND NO PART OF THE RECORD PER 10/7/2024 MINUTES DOCKET NO. 29).NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case as Frivolous filed by Defendant Tariq A. Nasheed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Semerdjieva, Nadia) Modified on 10/7/2024 (lc). |
Filing 26 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) #23 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court ORDERS that Defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to October 7, 2024. No further extensions will be granted. (rolm) |
![]() |
Filing 24 DECLARATION of Nadia Gueorguieva Semerdjieva in support of First REQUEST for Extension of Time to File a response #23 filed by Defendant Tariq A. Nasheed. (Semerdjieva, Nadia) |
Filing 23 First REQUEST for Extension of Time to File a response filed by Defendant Tariq A. Nasheed. (Attorney Nadia Gueorguieva Semerdjieva added to party Tariq A. Nasheed(pty:dft)) (Semerdjieva, Nadia) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 19 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Scudder Aisling Sodergreen. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. (car) |
Filing 18 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 17 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 16 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (car) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF RECEIPT OF CASE TRANSFERRED IN: Formerly Case Number: 1:24-cv-00389-GLR, from U.S. District Court District of Maryland (Baltimore). The above-referenced case has been transferred to this district and assigned the above civil case number 2:24-cv-06922-ODW (PVCx). (car) |
Filing 14 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from Maryland |
Filing 13 LETTER ORDER denying #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; directing the case to be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Signed by Chief District Judge George Levi Russell, III on 8/12/2024. (c/m 8/12/2024 ybs, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 8/16/2024.] |
Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to File Physical Exhibit Thumb Drive as Exhibit 1 re #10 Response and #11 Notice of Filing, by Taharka Aboke Bey. (dass, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 8/16/2024.] |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Filing of Physical Exhibit by Taharka Aboke Bey re #10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (ybs, Deputy Clerk) (Flash drive filed separately - Forwarded to chambers 5/17/2024 by das) Modified on 5/17/2024 (dass, Deputy Clerk). Modified on 5/17/2024 (ybs, Deputy Clerk). [Transferred from Maryland on 8/16/2024.] |
Filing 10 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Taharka Aboke Bey.(ybs, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 8/16/2024.] |
Filing 9 Rule 12/56 notice mailed to Taharka Aboke Bey (c/m 4/24/2024 ybs, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 8/16/2024.] |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Tariq A. Nasheed (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Supplement)(Sobel, Mark) [Transferred from Maryland on 8/16/2024.] |
Filing 7 QC NOTICE: #6 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Tariq A. Nasheed was filed incorrectly. **The following attachments or exhibits are missing - Proposed order. To correct this problem, file Proposed order using the event Notice (Other) and link Proposed order to #6 . (ybs, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 8/16/2024.] |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Tariq A. Nasheed(Sobel, Mark) Modified on 4/24/2024 (ybs, Deputy Clerk). [Transferred from Maryland on 8/16/2024.] |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Taharka Aboke Bey. Tariq A. Nasheed served on 4/2/2024, answer due 4/23/2024.(ybs, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 8/16/2024.] |
Filing 4 Summons Issued 21 days as to Tariq A. Nasheed.(c/m 3/6/2024 ybs, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 8/16/2024.] |
![]() |
Filing 2 New Case Notification Letter sent to Taharka Aboke Bey. (c/m 2/8/2024 ybs, Deputy Clerk) [Transferred from Maryland on 8/16/2024.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tariq A. Nasheed, ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number 7553) filed by Taharka Aboke Bey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(ybs, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 2/8/2024 (ybs, Deputy Clerk). [Transferred from Maryland on 8/16/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.