Nahid Lahiji v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
Nahid Lahiji |
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Greg Ward, Christopher Pratt, Kent Stiles and Trevor Evans |
2:2024cv07436 |
August 30, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Rozella A Oliver |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Receipt of Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court. (jp) |
Filing 12 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court. Case number: 24STCV08736. (jp) |
![]() |
Filing 10 STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Boos, Nicholas) |
![]() |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero to Judge Consuelo B. Marshall for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:24-cv-07436 CBM(RAOx). (rn) |
Filing 7 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (es) |
Filing 6 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Liberty Mutual Insurance Company answer now due 9/20/2024, re Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.(Boos, Nicholas) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (car) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Trevor Evans, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Christopher Pratt, Kent Stiles, Greg Ward. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Nahid Lahiji. Filed in State Court on 4/8/2024 Submitted with Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Boos, Nicholas) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.. (Boos, Nicholas) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, identifying Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., LMHC Massachusetts Holdings, Inc., Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc.. (Boos, Nicholas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, case number 24STCV08736 Receipt No: ACACDC-38131696 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D - Civil Case Cover Sheet Addendum and Statement of Location, #5 Exhibit E - Notice of Case Assignment, #6 Exhibit F - Notice of Case Management Conference, #7 Exhibit G - ADR Information Packet, #8 Exhibit H - Substitution of Attoney) (Attorney Nicholas J. Boos added to party Liberty Mutual Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Boos, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.