Lydia Atef Rofaeel et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Ramy Alfy Zkry Saad and Lydia Atef Saad Rofaeel |
Matthew D. Emrich, Ted H. Kim, Christopher A Wray, United States Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles Asylum Office, DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M JADDOU, David Radel and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES |
2:2024cv07634 |
September 6, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Lydia Atef Saad Rofaeel, Ramy Alfy Zkry Saad. (Thomas, Gihan) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Lydia Atef Saad Rofaeel, Ramy Alfy Zkry Saad, (Thomas, Gihan) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Lydia Atef Saad Rofaeel, Ramy Alfy Zkry Saad. (Thomas, Gihan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38167468 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Ramy Alfy Zkry Saad, Lydia Atef Saad Rofaeel. (Attorney Gihan L. Thomas added to party Lydia Atef Saad Rofaeel(pty:pla), Attorney Gihan L. Thomas added to party Ramy Alfy Zkry Saad(pty:pla))(Thomas, Gihan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.