John Boyd et al v. SunButter, LLC
| John Boyd and Jana Rabinowitz |
| SunButter, LLC |
| 2:2024cv07873 |
| September 13, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Brianna Fuller Mircheff |
| George H Wu |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties of Interested Parties filed by Defendant SunButter, LLC, identifying Red River Commodities. (Wagner, Willis) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (aco) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant SunButter, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 12/19/2024 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H Wu. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wagner, Willis) |
| Filing 12 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to SunButter, LLC answer now due 11/6/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant SunButter, LLC.(Wagner, Willis) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to SunButter, LLC answer now due 10/21/2024, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant SunButter, LLC.(Attorney Willis M Wagner added to party SunButter, LLC(pty:dft))(Wagner, Willis) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff John Boyd, Jana Rabinowitz, upon Defendant SunButter, LLC served on 9/16/2024, answer due 10/7/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Allison Wechel, Authorized to Accept Service for CT Corporation System, Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service (Klein, Lilach) |
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS by Judge George H Wu. (lom)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant SunButter, LLC. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Brianna Fuller Mircheff. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs John Boyd, Jana Rabinowitz, identifying Plaintiffs John Boyd and Jana Rabinowitz and Defendant SunButter, LLC. (Klein, Lilach) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs John Boyd, Jana Rabinowitz. (Klein, Lilach) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs John Boyd, Jana Rabinowitz. (Klein, Lilach) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38211984 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiffs John Boyd, Jana Rabinowitz. (Attorney Lilach Halperin Klein added to party John Boyd (pty:pla), Attorney Lilach Halperin Klein added to party Jana Rabinowitz(pty:pla))(Klein, Lilach) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
