Santistevan v. Marquez et al
| Joseph Anthony Santistevan |
| Suzy Marquez |
| 2:2024cv08857 |
| October 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michelle Williams Court |
| John D Early |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#24-0158) approved by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the CREATION OF CALENDAR of Judge Michelle Williams Court, this case is transferred from Judge Wesley L. Hsu to the calendar of Honorable Michelle Williams Court for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:24-cv-08857 MWC(JDE). (rn)
|
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 , Complaint (Redacted) #8 as to Defendant Suzy Marquez. (hr) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Joseph Anthony Santistevan (hr) |
| Filing 10 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Joseph Anthony Santistevan. (hr) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL ORDER UPON FILING OF COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (mba)
|
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT(Redacted) filed against Defendant Suzy Marquez. Case assigned to Judge Wesley L. Hsu and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (Filing fee $405 FEE PAID), filed by Plaintiff Joseph Anthony Santistevan. (mba) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, Directing Sealing Complaint (Dkt. 1) and Directing the Filing of a Redacted Version. On October 10, 2024, Plaintiff Joseph Anthony Santistevan ("Plaintiff"), proceedingpro se, filed a Complaint against Suzy Marquez. Dkt. 1 (Complaint). Plaintiff attached three photographs to the Complaint that contain material that the Court finds implicating the privacy rights of third parties sufficient for good cause for sealing the photographs to limit access to them by nonparties under Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2 (e). See Complaint at 36, 37 (CM/ECF pagination). As a result, the Court ORDERS that the Complaint (Dkt. 1) be placed under seal and the Clerk's Office is directed to completely redact the three photographs contained at pages 36 and 37 (CM/ECF pagination) of the Complaints attachments and file the redacted Complaint as Complaint (Redacted) on the public docket. Parties and the counsel only may have electronic access to the unredacted Complaint absent further Court order. re: Complaint - (Referred) #1 . (mba)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Wesley L. Hsu and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was/were found: Other error(s) with document(s): No address for the defendant. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (sh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Complaint - (Referred) #1 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7-1.1 no notice of interested parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (sh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Filed Document RE: Complaint - (Referred) #1 . The following error(s) was/were found: Other error(s) with document(s): No civil cover sheet the cover sheet was blank in the EDSS. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (sh) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint - (Referred) #1 filed by Plaintiff Joseph Anthony Santistevan. (sh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants City of Oxnard, Suzy Marquez Case assigned to Judge Wesley L. Hsu and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early.(Filing fee $405 FEE PAID), filed by Plaintiff Joseph Anthony Santistevan. (sh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Santistevan v. Marquez et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Suzy Marquez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph Anthony Santistevan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
