Anthony Spence v. Bank of America, National Association et al
Anthony Spence |
Dana Lee Goodenow, ReconTrust Company, N.A., Purported V.P. for MERS, Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Real Time Resolutions, Inc., Bank of America, National Association, ZBS Law, LLP, The Bank of New York Mellon, Frederick N. Spence, Bac Home Loans Servicing, LP, BAC GP, LLC, Agent for Real Time Resolutions Inc., PRA CP Opportunity Trust I, Marc Hart, Bank of America Corporation, Susan E. Smith, All Persons Unknown Claiming, Mortgage Electronic Registration System Inc. and Rick Mroczek |
2:2024cv10613 |
December 9, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
John A Kronstadt |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS #5 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (san) |
Filing 41 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (san) |
Filing 39 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER STRIKING Plaintiff's Response and Objection to Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc.'s Notice of Order in Other Actions or Proceedings (Dkt. #37 ) by Daniel Torrez, Courtroom Deputy Clerk to Judge John A. Kronstadt: You are hereby notified that due to a clerical error the Plaintiff's Response and Objection to Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc.'s Notice of Order in Other Actions or Proceedings (Dkt. #37 ) is STRICKEN. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dto) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 40 Plaintiff's SUPPLEMENT BRIEF in Opposition to Defendant's NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #5 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (es) |
![]() |
Filing 37 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE AND OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT REAL TIME RESOLUTIONS, INC.'S NOTICE OF ORDER IN OTHER ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS #36 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (yl) |
Filing 36 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc.to Request for Judicial Notice #33 (Lucey, Nathaniel) |
![]() |
Filing 34 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A EX PARTE MOTION TO STAY #31 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (yl) |
Filing 33 JUDICIAL NOTICE OF FILING ADVERSARY PROCEEDING #31 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (yl) |
Filing 32 OPPOSITION re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay #31 filed by Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum request for Judicial Notice)(Lucey, Nathaniel) |
Filing 31 EX PARTE EMERGENCY MOTION TO STAY FORECLOSURE SALE PENDING OUTCOME OF MOTION TO DISMISS HEARING filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (yl) |
Filing 30 NOTICE of Decision: Order dismissing case with a permanent bar to being a debtor in bankruptcy filed by Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc.. (Lucey, Nathaniel) |
Filing 28 FOR COURT USE: STATISTICAL CORRECTION regarding #23 #24 #25 regarding order #27 (yl) |
![]() |
Filing 29 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (yl) |
Filing 26 DECLARATION OF ANTHONY SPENCE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR Telephonic Appearance at the Hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint #24 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (yl) |
Filing 25 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (yl) |
Filing 24 REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE FOR THE HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (yl) |
Filing 23 REQUEST for Leave of Nathaniel R. Lucey to Appear for telephonically or by ZOOM filed by Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc.. Request set for hearing on 2/3/2025 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of N. Lucey) (Lucey, Nathaniel) |
Filing 22 REPLY NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint #5 filed by Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc.. (Lucey, Nathaniel) |
Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (yl) |
Filing 20 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence, identifying other affiliates RRA CP OPPORTUNITY TRUST 1 and CWHEQ Revolving Home Equity Trust Series 2005-M for Anthony Spence. (yl) |
Filing 19 OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT REAL TIME RESOLUTIONS, INC.'S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE #5 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (yl) |
Filing 18 PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS #5 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (yl) |
Filing 17 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7-3 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (yl) |
Filing 16 AFFIDAVIT OF ANTHONY SPENCE filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (yl) |
Filing 15 PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS #5 filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (yl) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:24-cv-10613 JAK(RAOx). (rn) |
Filing 6 Declination of Consent form received on 12/16/2024 was submitted within deadline set forth in L.R. 73-2.1. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cgm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Real Time Resolutions, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 1/29/2025 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Memorandum Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Lucey, Nathaniel) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence, re REQUEST for Approval #7 , Lis Pendens Notice #8 served on 12/13/2024. (es) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Lis Pendens filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (es) |
Filing 7 REQUEST for Approval to Record Lis Pendens filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (es) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to a U.S. Magistrate Judge and Declination of Consent. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin. (et) |
Filing 3 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to clerical error. Case is transferred to the Western Division. Case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge A. Joel Richlin for all further proceedings. New Case Number 2:24-cv-10613-AIJ. (et) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants All Persons Unknown Claiming, BAC GP, LLC, Bac Home Loans Servicing, LP, Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, National Association, Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Dana Lee Goodenow, Marc Hart, Mortgage Electronic Registration System Inc., Rick Mroczek, PRA CP Opportunity Trust I, Real Time Resolutions, Inc., ReconTrust Company, N.A., Susan E. Smith, Frederick N. Spence, The Bank of New York Mellon, ZBS Law, LLP. Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Anthony Spence. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/4/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT 3 TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Real Time Resolutions Inc. (Lucey, Nathaniel) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 24stcv28794 Receipt No: ACACDC-38722956 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant Real Time Resolutions Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of N. Lucey, #2 Exhibit to Decl of N. Lucey -1-16) (Attorney Nathaniel R Lucey added to party Real Time Resolutions Inc(pty:dft))(Lucey, Nathaniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.