United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. 5919 Reseda Blvd. LLC et al
| James Lee and United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members |
| DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, and 5919 RESEDA BLVD. LLC |
| 2:2024cv11014 |
| December 22, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Fair Housing Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court has reviewed the Response filed by Plaintiff and Plaintiff's counsel to the Court's Order to Show Cause in which Plaintiffs state that they "do not oppose the Court's Order to Show Cause "to decline supplement[al] jurisdiction over only Plaintiffs'... state law claims #12 . The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercisesupplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (lc)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiffs United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, James Leeto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, #10 RESPONSE BY PLAINTIFFS TO OSC DATED 12-30-2024 REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION (Wakefield, David) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: ORDER REGARDING PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN CASES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. The Court finds that there is good cause to institute a limited scheduling order concerning basic case prosecution for cases under the Americans With Disabilities Act involving physical barriers in places of public accommodation. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC ENUMERATED REQUIREMENTS AND DEADLINES THEREIN). The failure to comply with this Order in a particular case will result in a sanction of $300.00 payable to the clerk of the court within two weeks of Plaintiff being given notice of noncompliance and dismissal for lack of prosecution. The Court finds these sanctions sufficient and necessary to deter violations of the Order and to achieve timely prosecution of these cases without unnecessary intervention by the Court. (lc)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing No Later Than Two Weeks from date of this order, why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and any other state law claim asserted in the Complaint. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state law claims, if any, and the dismissal of that claim pursuant to 28 USC 1367 (c). (lc)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY- No mandatory chambers copies required, EXCEPT FOR motions for summary judgment and any other evidence-heavy motions. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant 5919 RESEDA BLVD. LLC. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, James Lee. (Wakefield, David) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, identifying 5919 RESEDA BLVD. LLC. (Wakefield, David) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, James Lee. (Wakefield, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38802926 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiffs United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, James Lee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Civil Complaint, #2 Exhibit B to Civil Complaint, #3 Exhibit C to Civil Complaint) (Attorney David C Wakefield added to party United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members(pty:pla), Attorney David C Wakefield added to party James Lee(pty:pla))(Wakefield, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
