Viktoria Kovtun v. Jennifer B. Higgins et al
Viktoria Kovtun |
Jennifer B. Higgins, Benjamine Huffman, James R. McHenry, III, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Does 1-5 |
2:2025cv00589 |
January 22, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
George H Wu |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Jennifer B. Higgins, Benjamine Huffman, James R. McHenry, III, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (lh) |
Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Ezzati, H.) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Viktoria KOVTUN. (Ezzati, H.) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Viktoria KOVTUN. (Ezzati, H.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38961595 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Viktoria KOVTUN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-C as indexed) (Attorney H. Henry Ezzati added to party Viktoria KOVTUN(pty:pla))(Ezzati, H.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.