Vijay Ratthinam et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Vijay Ratthinam, Rashmi Balakrishna and I V |
| USCIS, Tracy Tarango, Jennifer Higgins and Kristi Noem |
| 2:2025cv00802 |
| January 30, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Vijay Ratthinam, Rashmi Balakrishna, I V. (Patel, Niralkumar) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Patel, Niralkumar) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Vijay Ratthinam, Rashmi Balakrishna, I V. (Patel, Niralkumar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-39008479 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Vijay Ratthinam, I V, Rashmi Balakrishna. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiffs' I-485 Receipt, #2 Exhibit Plaintiffs' I-765 Approvals, #3 Exhibit Redacted Approvals, #4 Exhibit USCIS Data) (Attorney Niralkumar Patel added to party Vijay Ratthinam(pty:pla), Attorney Niralkumar Patel added to party Rashmi Balakrishna(pty:pla), Attorney Niralkumar Patel added to party I V(pty:pla))(Patel, Niralkumar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
