Lindsay John Max v. Robert J Hernandez
Petitioner: Lindsay John Max
Respondent: Robert J Hernandez
Case Number: 5:2003cv00788
Filed: April 14, 2010
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Eastern Division - Riverside Office
Presiding Judge: James V. Selna
Presiding Judge: Carla M. Woehrle
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna, IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and the action dismissed with prejudice. R&R Adopting Report and Recommendations, 38 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lmh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lindsay John Max v. Robert J Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert J Hernandez
Represented By: Kevin R Vienna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Lindsay John Max
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?