Thoams Irvin Brown v. Derral Adams
Petitioner: Thomas Irvin Brown, III
Respondent: Derral G Adams, .
Case Number: 5:2004cv00611
Filed: February 23, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Eastern Division - Riverside Office
Presiding Judge: Stephen V. Wilson
Presiding Judge: Carla Woehrle
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, in favor of Thomas Irvin Brown, III against Derral G Adams. IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thoams Irvin Brown v. Derral Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Derral G Adams, .
Represented By: Pamela A Ratner Sobeck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Thomas Irvin Brown, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?