-CW Pete Adame v. Carol Daly

Petitioner: Pete Adame
Respondent: Carol Daly, -
Case Number: 5:2004cv00650
Filed: March 28, 2011
Court: California Central District Court
Office: Eastern Division - Riverside Office
Referring Judge: Carla Woehrle
Presiding Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 28, 2011 30 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D Wright, II, IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and the action dismissed with prejudice. Related to: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) 1 , R&R Adopting Report and Recommendations, 29 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lmh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: -CW Pete Adame v. Carol Daly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Pete Adame
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Carol Daly, -
Represented By: Jennifer L Heinisch
Represented By: J Conrad Schroeder
Represented By: Beneth A Browne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?