Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc v. Aventis Pharma SA et al
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals Inc |
Aventis Pharma SA, Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc, DOES and Sanofi-Aventis SA |
U.S. DOJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
5:2009cv00023 |
November 14, 2012 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Eastern Division - Riverside Office |
Marvin J. Garbis |
Oswald Parada |
Patent |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 661 OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani, re: Defendants Aventis Pharma S.A., Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Sanofi-Aventis S.A. (collectively "Defendants") Supplemental Submission Pursuant to the Court' s November 13, 2020 Fee Amount Order against Plaintiff Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 634 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Submission is GRANTED in part. Specifically, Defendants are awarded $17,203,703 for fees, expenses, and interest for work performed in this case from October 28, 2011, when the Complaint was unsealed, through November 13, 2020, when the Court issued its Fee Order. (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 452 SHOW CAUSE PROCEDURAL ORDER by Judge Marvin J. Garbis. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/20/2016. By June 13, Amphastar and counsel shall file a response to the Show Cause Order [ECF No. 450]. By July 7, Aventis shall file a reply. By July 21, Amphastar and counsel may file any sur-reply. The Court shall arrange a telephone conference to discuss, in light of the aforesaid filings, such further proceedings as may be appropriate. (mrgo) |
Filing 450 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED by Judge Marvin J. Garbis. (See document for specifics.) (iva) |
Filing 380 SUPERSEDING DECISION RE: JURISDICTION by Judge Marvin J. Garbis. (See document for specifics) (mrgo) |
Filing 379 JUDGMENT by Judge Marvin J. Garbis related to: Decision Re: Jurisdiction 378 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (See document for specifics.) (iva) |
Filing 78 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Judge Marvin J. Garbis RE MOTION to Dismiss 43 : (see document image for further details). For the foregoing reasons: 1. Defendants Request for Judicial Notice [Document 44] is GRANTED; 2. Defendants Motion to Dismiss False Claims Act Qui Tam Complaint [Document 43-1] is GRANTED IN PART. a. The False Claims Act Qui Tam Complaint [Document 43-1] is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. b. Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint to add allegations pertaining to the filing of false claims18 by November 30, 2012; 3. Plaintiff shall arrange a telephone conference tobe held by November 30, 2012, to discuss the scheduling of further proceedings. SO ORDERED. (ad) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.