Greg Fairchild v. Douglas Fettel et al
| Greg Fairchild |
| County of San Bernardino Public Defender Office, Treza Edwards, Douglas Fettel, County of San Bernardino Superior Court, Lana Langlolis and Does |
| 5:2009cv00549 |
| March 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Eastern Division - Riverside Office |
| San Bernardino |
| Klausner |
| Rosenberg |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner Related to: R&R Adopting Report and Recommendations, 36 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). Pursuant to the order adopting the magistrate judge's amended report and recommendation dated August 18, 2009, and the order adopting magistrate judge's report and recommendation, IT IS ADJUDGED that Judgment is entered in favor of all Defendants. (mp)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge R. Gary Klausner 25 . IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Amended Report and Recommendation is adopted; 2. Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted; 3. All claims agai nst Defendant Judge Fettel are dismissed with prejudice; 4. All claims against San Bernardino Superior Court are dismissed without prejudice and without leave to amend; 5. Defendants' motion to strike is granted; and 6. Paragraph 3 of the complaint's prayer is stricken. (mp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
