Anthony Jesus Rodriguez v. Francisco Jaquez
Petitioner: Anthony Jesus Rodriguez
Respondent: Francisco Jaquez
Case Number: 5:2010cv01003
Filed: July 7, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Presiding Judge: John F. Walter
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. Pursuant to this Court's Order Adopting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anthony Jesus Rodriguez v. Francisco Jaquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Francisco Jaquez
Represented By: Teresa Torreblanca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony Jesus Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?