Janice Elaine Moseley v. Michael J Astrue

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Janice Elaine Moseley v. Michael J Astrue

Janice Elaine Moseley v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Janice Elaine Moseley
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	5:2013cv00282
Filed:	February 13, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Jay C. Gandhi
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 10, 2014	Filing 16 ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi. Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Pa yment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $3,150.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and costs in the amount of $350.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. 15 (bem)
November 12, 2013	Filing 14 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 13 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is REVERSED and this matter REMANDED, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bem)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 10, 2014

Filing 16 ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi. Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Pa yment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $3,150.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and costs in the amount of $350.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. 15 (bem)

November 12, 2013

Filing 14 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 13 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is REVERSED and this matter REMANDED, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bem)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Janice Elaine Moseley v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Ann L Maley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janice Elaine Moseley
Represented By:	Cyrus Safa
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?