Verdana Pauline Thomas v. Michael J Astrue
| Verdana Pauline Thomas |
| Michael J Astrue |
| 5:2013cv00597 |
| April 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gary A. Feess |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 34 . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) fees, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of six thousand five hundred dollars and no cents ($6,500.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. §2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. Any payment shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel. (mp)
|
|
Filing
33
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, in favor of Verdana Pauline Thomas against Michael J Astrue Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 32 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that judgment is entered for the Plaintiff and that this action is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent withthe Memorandum Opinion and Order. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/26/2014. To date, Plaintiff has not filed a motion for summary ju dgment. Accordingly, no later than February 26, 2014, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and to abide by court orders. Filing of Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on or before February 26, 2014, shall be deemed compliance with this Order to Show Cause. (See Order for details.) (mp)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg.Pursuant to this Court's Order of April 15, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to file a Proof of Service showing compliance with Paragraph I of the Court's Order within thirty 120 days o f the filing on the complaint, i.e., by August 13, 2013. The Court's Order warned Plaintiff that failure to comply "may result in the dismissal of this case." To date, the Proof of Service has not been filed with the Court. Accordingl y, no later than September 19, 2013, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Filing of the Proof of Service on or before September 19, 2013, shall be deemed compliance with this Order to Show Cause. (mp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Verdana Pauline Thomas v. Michael J Astrue | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Verdana Pauline Thomas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael J Astrue | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
