Federation of Telugu Associations of Southern California v. Telugu Association of Southern California
| Federation of Telugu Associations of Southern California |
| Telugu Association of Southern California |
| 5:2014cv01278 |
| June 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald S.W. Lew |
| Alka Sagar |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
144
ORDER Re: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT TELUGU ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 140 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: This Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. Additionally, this Court GRANTS Plaintiff's request for entry of a permanent injunction against Defendant. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. (jre)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DEFENDANT'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S PREVIOUS ORDER by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Defendant is advised and cautioned that it has until December 15, 2015, to provide this Court with proof of permanent counsel. A failure to respond may lead to the imposition of sanctions, including placing Defendant in default. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. (jre)
|
|
Filing
126
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court , on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than November 3, 2015, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: PLAINTIFFS FILING OF A MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT as to Defendant NAGESH ANKAM. No oral argument of this matter w ill be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a response or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. Failure to timely respond to this order may result in sanctions and/or the dismissal of this action. (jre)
|
|
Filing
36
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar re Stipulation for Protective Order 35 . *Note Changes Made by the Court* (afe)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Federation of Telugu Associations of Southern California v. Telugu Association of Southern California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Federation of Telugu Associations of Southern California | |
| Represented By: | Michael A Shimokaji |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Telugu Association of Southern California | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
