Dameia Smith v. Warden
Petitioner: Dameia Smith
Respondent: Warden
Case Number: 5:2014cv01283
Filed: June 24, 2014
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David T. Bristow
Presiding Judge: Valerie Baker Fairbank
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 28 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iva)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dameia Smith v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dameia Smith
Represented By: Jeremy Brian Gordon
Represented By: Caroline V Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Represented By: Assistant 2241-2255 US Attorney LA-CR
Represented By: Allison L Westfahl Kong
Represented By: Diana L Pauli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?