Charlene Galloway v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Charlene Galloway v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Charlene Galloway v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Charlene Galloway
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	5:2015cv00345
Filed:	February 26, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Christina A. Snyder
Presiding Judge:	Carla Woehrle
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 1, 2017	Filing 32 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Victor E Bianchini. Based upon the parties' Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees ("Stipulation") 26 , IT IS ORDERED that EAJA fees are awarded in the amount of SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($6,000.00) and costs of FOUR HUNDRED AND 00/100 ($400), subject to the terms of the Stipulation 26 . (wr)
March 28, 2016	Filing 21 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Victor E Bianchini in favor of Charlene Galloway against Carolyn W. Colvin. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order 20 , it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order rema nding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is REMANDED for calculation of benefits; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for attorneys' fees and costs. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ). (wr)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 1, 2017

Filing 32 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Victor E Bianchini. Based upon the parties' Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees ("Stipulation") 26 , IT IS ORDERED that EAJA fees are awarded in the amount of SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($6,000.00) and costs of FOUR HUNDRED AND 00/100 ($400), subject to the terms of the Stipulation 26 . (wr)

March 28, 2016

Filing 21 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Victor E Bianchini in favor of Charlene Galloway against Carolyn W. Colvin. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Decision and Order 20 , it is hereby DECREED THAT (1) Plaintiff's request for an order rema nding this case for further proceedings is GRANTED and the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED; (2) the Commissioner's request for an order affirming the Commissioner's final decision and dismissing the action is DENIED; (3) judgment is entered in Plaintiff's favor and this case is REMANDED for calculation of benefits; and (4) this case is CLOSED without prejudice to a timely application for attorneys' fees and costs. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ). (wr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Charlene Galloway v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charlene Galloway
Represented By:	Colleen Michelle Higgins
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?