Mike A. Rosales v. Staples Contract & Commercial, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: |
Mike A. Rosales |
Defendant: |
Does and Staples Contract & Commercial, Inc. |
Case Number: |
5:2015cv00949 |
Filed: |
May 14, 2015 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
Presiding Judge: |
David T. Bristow |
Presiding Judge: |
John F. Walter |
Nature of Suit: |
Labor: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
July 27, 2015 |
Filing
38
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Remand to State Court 29 by Judge John F. Walter: Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED. This action is REMANDED to San Bernardino Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
July 24, 2015 |
Filing
36
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING UNDER SUBMISSION Plaintiff's Renewed Motion to Remand to State Court 29 by Judge John F. Walter: Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds that this mat ter is appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing calendared for July 27, 2015 is hereby vacated and the matter is taken off calendar. The matter will be deemed submitted on the vacated hearing date and the clerk will notify the parties when the Court has reached a decision. (jp)
|
June 17, 2015 |
Filing
25
(IN CHAMBERS): ORDER STRIKING MOTION TO REMAND 22 ; ORDER REQUIRING ADDITIONAL MEET AND CONFER; and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SANCTIONS by Judge John F. Walter: The Court hereby STRIKES Plaintiff's Motion to Remand 22 for failure to comply w ith Local Rule 7-3 and paragraph 5(b) of the Court's Standing Order. If Plaintiff wishes to re-file its Motion to Remand, the parties shall meet and confer in person by June 24, 2015. Within 3 days of the meet and confer, each party shall file a declaration setting forth the issues resolved at the conference and those issues that were not resolved with a detailed explanation of why those issues could not be resolved. If a Motion to Remand remains necessary, Plaintiff shall not file it until 2 days after each party files the declaration required by this Order. In addition, Plaintiff's counsel, Kevin T. Barnes, is ordered to show cause in writing by June 19, 2015 why he should not be sanctioned in the amount of $750 for failing to conduct and participate in a meaningful meet and confer conference regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Remand, as required by Local Rule 7-3 and the Court's Standing Order, and for his mischaracterization of the actual meet and co nfer conference in the Statement of Meet and Confer Regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jloz)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?