Clayton Omar Perkins v. W L Montgomery
Petitioner: Clayton Omar Perkins
Respondent: W L Montgomery
Case Number: 5:2015cv01186
Filed: June 18, 2015
Court: U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J. Carney
Presiding Judge: Gail J. Standish
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 20 JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney, in favor of W L Montgomery against Clayton Omar Perkins Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 19 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ec)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clayton Omar Perkins v. W L Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: W L Montgomery
Represented By: David Delgado-Rucci
Represented By: Kevin R Vienna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Clayton Omar Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?