David Totten v. Kellogg Brown and Root, LLC et al
||Does and Kellogg Brown and Root, LLC
||September 11, 2015
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Kenly Kiya Kato
||Otis D. Wright
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Jobs
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 16, 2016
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 12 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: In sum, because the Court finds no evidence of substantive unconscionability and only minimal procedural unconscionability, KBRs arb itration program is valid. For claims that may be properly brought before an arbitrator, the Court GRANTS KBRs Motion to Compel Arbitration. Those claims are therefore STAYED, and the parties are to notify the Court within seven (7) days of the conclusion of the arbitration proceedings. However, for the reasons discussed above, the Court DENIES KBRs Motion to Compel Arbitration as to the Title VII claims (lc) Modified on 2/16/2016 (lc).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?