A.R. v. Colton Joint Unified School District et al
A. R. |
Colton Joint Unified School District and San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools |
5:2016cv00713 |
April 15, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M. Gee |
Sheri Pym |
Civil Rights: Education |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Plaintiff A.R. has requested a Voluntary Dismissal with prejudice of the complaint he has filed in the District Court 22 , based on his representation that the parties to this matter have entered into a full settlement of the issues raised herein. This matter is now dismissed with prejudiced. The Order to Show Cause dated 6/27/2016 21 is DISCHARGED. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk) |
Filing 21 (IN CHAMBERS) - Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before July 11, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. (iv) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.