Chanel, Inc. v. Fariha Alhassen et al
| Chanel, Inc. |
| Fariha Alhassen, Does and Ahmad J. Lababidi |
| 5:2016cv00747 |
| April 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
PERMANENT INJUNCTION UPON STIPULATION RE CHANEL TRADEMARKS 34 as to Defendants, Fariha Alhassen, an individual, and Ahmad J. Lababidi a/k/a Jamil Lababidi a/k/a AJ Lababidi a/k/a Tommy, an individual, individually and jointly, d/b/a herteendream.co m d/b/a officialgoldiluxe.com d/b/a @herteendream d/b/a #herteendream d/b/a @farihaal d/b/a officialherteendream d/b/a farihaalh d/b/a her teen dream d/b/a goldiluxe d/b/a officialgoldiluxe d/b/a #officialgoldiluxe by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lc)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. In light of the Notice of Settlement (ECF No. 31 ), the Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, by November 7, 2016, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. All other dates and deadlines in thisaction are VACATED and taken off calendar. The parties have also agreed thatDefendant's motion to set aside summary judgment (ECF No. 26 ) shall beDISMISSED without prejudice. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filingof a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
