JL Audio Inc v. Kazi et al
Plaintiff: |
JL Audio Inc |
Defendant: |
Does, Giash U. Kazi and MK Financial Group Inc. |
Case Number: |
5:2016cv00785 |
Filed: |
April 25, 2016 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
Presiding Judge: |
John E. McDermott |
Presiding Judge: |
Christina A. Snyder |
Nature of Suit: |
Trademark |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
September 19, 2017 |
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court hereby enters final judgment against Defendant and ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES that: Plaintiff's Motion for Default Ju dgment 22 is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that: Defendant MK Financial Group Inc. d/b/a Auto Accessory Warehouse, its officers, agents, servants, employees, representatives, attorneys, their successors and assigns, and all other persons, firms, o r corporations in active concert or participation with Defendant who receive notice hereof, including but not limited to all subsidiaries, affiliates, licensees, employees, or assigns of Defendant, be permanently enjoined re JL Audio Mark, goods, products, merchandise, etc. See document for further details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)
|
September 18, 2017 |
Filing
24
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment 22 . The Court GRANTS plaintiff's motion for default judgment with respect to plaintiff's claims for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and injunctive relief against Auto Accessory Warehouse. It is hereby ordered that judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff with respect to these claims and with respect to plaintiff's request for injunctive relief against Auto Accessory Warehouse. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
August 3, 2016 |
Filing
12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Christina A. Snyder.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that PLAINTIFF show cause in writing not later than August 17, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendants GIAS H U. KAZI; and MK FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7.15, oral argument shall not be heard in the above matter unless so ordered by the Court. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of briefs. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the following: 1) Plaintiff's filing of a proof of service as to defendants GIASH U. KAZI; and MKFINANCIAL GROUP, INC. on or before the above date, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. (clee)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?