Quebec Distributing Co. v. Unique Produce Corp. et al
| Quebec Distributing Co. |
| Jose L. Cardenas, Gerard A. Corros and Unique Produce Corp. |
| 5:2016cv00834 |
| April 27, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gail J. Standish |
| Stephen V. Wilson |
| Agriculture Acts |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 27 . (See document for specifics) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
26
JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, Related to: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, 24 . Judgment is entered for plaintiff Quebec Distributing Co. and against defendant Unique Produce Corp., pursuant to the Court's order dated 8/29/16. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
12
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Co urt, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than July 7, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed as to Defendant Unique Produce Corp., served on May 17, 2016, with an answer due on June 7, 2016, for lack of prosecution. (pc)
|
|
Filing
10
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than June 23, 2016 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. (pc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
