Sream, Inc. v. Hanoun Hanoun et al
| Sream, Inc. |
| Does and Hanoun Hanoun |
| 5:2016cv01394 |
| June 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT HANOUN HANOUN PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 55(b) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment 17 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff on all c laims except its Trademark Counterfeiting claim under 15 U.S.C. Section 1116, and Hanoun shall be liable to Plaintiff in the amount of $54,200.00 (comprising statutory damages of $50,000, attorney's fees and costs in the amount of 6;4,200.00). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Hanoun, his agents, employees, officers, directors, owners, representatives, successor companies, related companies, and all persons acting in concern or participation with him are permanently restrained and enjoined re the RooR Marks, etc. See document for further details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)
|
|
Filing
11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U. S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before August 24, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for la ck of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) resp onse. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendant(s) Hanoun Hanoun did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. (clee)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
