Benita Becerra v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Plaintiff: Benita Becerra
Defendant: J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2016cv01460
Filed: July 5, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jesus G. Bernal
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: denying 12 MOTION to Strike Expert Disclosure; and (b) Vacating Hearing [Dkt. 12] AND VACATING the hearing on April 27, 2017. (dts)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Benita Becerra v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benita Becerra
Represented By: C Michael Alder
Represented By: Marni Beth Folinsky
Represented By: Kenneth A Satin
Represented By: Allison Leah Stone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.
Represented By: Lawrence D Esten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?