Bonnie Ruth v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Plaintiff: Bonnie Ruth
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 5:2016cv01513
Filed: July 11, 2016
Court: California Central District Court
Referring Judge: Sheri Pym
Presiding Judge: Josephine L. Staton
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 10, 2017 30 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed and this matter is dismissed with prejudice. Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 29 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bonnie Ruth v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bonnie Ruth
Represented By: Erika Bailey Drake
Represented By: Roger David Drake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?