Steven Gandarilla v. Carolyn W Colvin

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Steven Gandarilla v. Carolyn W Colvin

Steven Gandarilla v. Carolyn W Colvin

Plaintiff:	Steven Gandarilla
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	5:2016cv01715
Filed:	August 8, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Michael W. Fitzgerald
Presiding Judge:	Frederick F. Mumm
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 20, 2017	Filing 23 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. In accordance with the Memorandum Decision and Order filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the decision of the defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security Administration, is affirmed and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 22 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)
May 25, 2017	Filing 20 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/5/2017: Accordingly, the parties are ordered to show cause, in writing and within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, why they have failed to file the joint stipulation. The filing of the joint stipulation within this time frame will be deemed a sufficient response to this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jm)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 20, 2017

Filing 23 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. In accordance with the Memorandum Decision and Order filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the decision of the defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security Administration, is affirmed and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Related to: Memorandum & Opinion 22 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sbou)

May 25, 2017

Filing 20 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/5/2017: Accordingly, the parties are ordered to show cause, in writing and within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, why they have failed to file the joint stipulation. The filing of the joint stipulation within this time frame will be deemed a sufficient response to this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steven Gandarilla v. Carolyn W Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven Gandarilla
Represented By:	Laura E Krank
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?