Bryan Grigsby et al v. DC 4400 LLC et al
Bryan Grigsby and Lindsey Maness |
DC 4400, LLC, DC 4x4, LLC, Does, J.T. Stephens and Vantage Investment Holdings, LLC |
5:2016cv01809 |
August 23, 2016 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sheri Pym |
Christina A. Snyder |
Contract: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Plaintiffs' Application to Appoint a Receiver and for a Preliminary Injunction 20 ; Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 36 ; Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Stephens' De claration attached to the Motion to Dismiss 37 . Plaintiffs request that the Court stay proceedings here pending arbitration rather than dismiss plaintiffs' remaining claims. The Court agrees. Having concluded that the parties must submit the q uestion of arbitrability to an arbitrator, the Court finds a stay appropriate. Proceedings in this case are hereby STAYED pending arbitration pursuant to the arbitration clause of the Agreement. It is ORDERED that this action is hereby removed from t his Court's active caseload until further application by the parties or order of this Court. Plaintiffs' application for appointment of a receiver or for a preliminary injunction is DENIED without prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.