The Burlington Insurance Company v. DDL Traffic Inc et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 11, 2018
JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff The Burlington Insurance Company and against defendant DDL Traffic, Inc. and Binita Patel. It is hereby declared and adjudged th at: There is and was no coverage for the claims asserted by Patel against DDL Traffic in Patel v. Eichmann, et al., No.CIVDS1504718 in the Superior Court of the state of California for the County of San Bernardino (the "Underlying Action") under any insurance policy issued by Burlington to DDL. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
|February 8, 2017
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE; DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge R. Gary Klausner: In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before February 14, 2017 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendant Binita Patel. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order To Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. (cr)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?