Sream, Inc. v. Sarah-Q, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Sream, Inc.
Defendant: Does and Sarah-Q, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2016cv02375
Filed: November 17, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Presiding Judge: Terry J. Hatter
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT SARAH-Q,INC. by Judge Terry J. Hatter: The Parties entered into a settlement agreement as of January 20, 2017 (Settlement Agreement), which requires entry of the stipulated judgment . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: That judgment be entered in favor of Sream against Sarah-Q on all claims. For the purposes of binding preclusive effect on Sarah-Q as to future disputesbetween Sarah-Q and Sream, and only for such p urposes, Sarah-Q admits the following: a. Mr. Martin Birzle is now, and has been at all times since the dates of issuance, the owner of United States Trademark Registration Nos. 2,235,638; 2,307,176; and 3,675,839 (the RooR Marks) and of all rights t hereto and thereunder. The RooR Marks are valid and enforceable. Sarah-Q, and those acting on Sarah-Qs behalf (including its owners, shareholders, principals, officers, agents, servants, employees, independent contractors, andpartners), are permanent ly enjoined from producing, manufacturing, distributing, selling, offer for sale, advertising, promoting, licensing, or marketing (a) any product bearing the RooR Marks or (b) any design, mark, or feature that is confusingly similar to the RooR Marks (collectively, the Injunction). (See order for further details). (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (shb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sream, Inc. v. Sarah-Q, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sarah-Q, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sream, Inc.
Represented By: Kathrynn Frances Benson
Represented By: Imran F Vakil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?