Emilio Castaneda Tirado v. David Shinn
Emilio Castaneda Tirado |
David Shinn |
5:2017cv00125 |
January 25, 2017 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E. Scott |
Stephen V. Wilson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Pursuant to the Court's Order Summarily Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is dismissed without prejudice. Related to: Order 3 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mba) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Emilio Castaneda Tirado v. David Shinn | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: David Shinn | |
Represented By: | Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Emilio Castaneda Tirado | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.