Estate of Pedro Montanez et al v. City of Indio et al
||Estate of Pedro Montanez, Christina Montanez, Pedro Montanez, Ramona Montanez and Maria Telles
||City of Indio, Chris Cordova, Does, Kevin Fowler and Indio Police Department
||January 25, 2017
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||David T. Bristow
||Otis D. Wright
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 14, 2019
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 68 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) .(lc). Modified on 3/14/2019 (lc).
|April 25, 2018
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 46 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 46) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is GRANTED with respect to: (1) the first claim of excessive force claim as it pertains to Officer Fowler; (2) the second claim of Municipal Liability against the City of Indio and the Indio Police Department; (3) the third claim of Substantive Due Process Violation against all Defendants; and (4) the fourth claim of Assault and Battery as it pertains to Officer Fowler in his individual capacity. Otherwise, the Defendants' motion is DENIED. (lom)
|April 12, 2017
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS: Order to Show Cause by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE, in writing only, no later than May 1, 2017, why the Court should not dismiss Defendants City of Indio, Indio Police Department, Chris Cor dova, and Kevin Fowler based on Plaintiff's failure to serve the Complaint within the Rule 4(m) period. No hearing will be held. The Court will discharge this order upon the filing of a proof of service as to each Defendant. Failure to timely respond to this Order will result in the dismissal of these Defendants without further warning. (smo)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?